Maybe it’s because my approach to the news is booze-oriented, but it seems to me that politicians and lawmakers love to default to overkill when it comes to alcohol. Don’t get me wrong, I think that it’s good to have regulation on drinking age and such, although I may disagree with the current levels. Alcohol is an adult beverage and should be treated as such. On the other hand, those of us who legally enjoy alcohol are adults and should be treated as such.
Here’s what set me off this time.
Back on Labor Day, 2008, an “alcohol-fueled riot,” whatever the hell that means, on a beach in San Diego led to a permanent ban to drinking on the beach.
Let’s think about this. A one time incident where, presumably, a number of laws were broken by a few ill-behaved people led to a complete ban of alcohol. Isn’t it enough to arrest and punish these people based on the actual laws that they broke? Whether I’m drinking or not, I know that I’m not supposed to strike or otherwise physically hurt those around me. But now, thanks to these few people and the overreaction of lawmakers, no one can drink on San Diego’s beaches. There’s no way to scientifically prove this but I imagine that 90%+ of the people who historically drank on the beach were peaceful, law-abiding citizens.
But let’s move on. The ban is in place. But the author of the law forgot to include the water. Yup, it’s illegal to drink on the beach but not on the water. So, a new San Diego tradition was born - floatopia parties. Drinkers would gather in the water, often on inflatable floaty things and enjoy their booze. Although not illegal, this is still a subversive act so, as one might expect, it attracted a wilder crowd.
Whenever an unreasonable law like the beach drinking ban is put in place, people will react this way. Rule 1) people will drink. Rule 2) lawmakers need to find a way to live with rule 1. Exhibit A - Prohibition.
Now we have a clutch of floating drinkers. Since they’re out in the water and have to remain there, they have nothing much to do but drink, meaning they’re going to drink a heluva lot more than they would if they were on the beach enjoying a barbecue, playing volleyball, whatever. They’re drunker and wilder and clearly something must be done. They disrupt others’ enjoyment of the beach and, of course, someone had to bring up the issue of broken bottles. (Why is this always brought up? I almost never see a broken bottle when I’m out drinking, subversively or otherwise. It’s like they believe that broken glass is somehow integral to drinking.)
Does anyone consider lifting the beach drinking ban? Of freakin’ course not! No, we need tighter regulations. Now, the council has banned drinking in the water.
What’s the reaction going to be? Hard to say but the usual course of things under circumstances such as these is drinking really hard liquor secretly. I can foresee college kids arriving at the beach, slamming back way to much vodka in the car and then stumbling out onto the beach. Would you rather share the beach with that bunch or the family with a mom and dad who like to have a beer or two while they watch the kids play in the surf.
I realize that I’m participating in the same hyperbolic conjecture that leads to these silly bans but, if they can do it so can we!
San Diego City Council, lighten up. It’s time to look at the restrictions that caused the problem rather than imposing more restrictions.
drinking ban drinking laws floatopia san diegoShare This